Which statement about landward sites is true?

Which statement about landward sites is true?

• A. They were added in 1972 to broaden the definition of suits to include landward sites
• B. They relate to offshore platforms
• C. They are irrelevant to maritime claims
• D. They exclude harbor workers from coverage

Answer: (A)

The main idea is the expansion of maritime workers’ compensation coverage to land-based locations tied to maritime work. In 1972, Congress broadened the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act so injuries occurring on land in the course of maritime employment—landward sites—could be covered. This means workers injured at places like docks, yards, warehouses, or ship repair facilities on land related to maritime operations can still receive benefits. That’s why the statement is true: landward sites were added to widen the scope of coverage. Offshore platforms are not the focus here (they’re seaward), and the amendments did not exclude harbor workers or make coverage irrelevant to maritime claims; they actually broaden who and where benefits apply to.

The main idea is the expansion of maritime workers’ compensation coverage to land-based locations tied to maritime work. In 1972, Congress broadened the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act so injuries occurring on land in the course of maritime employment—landward sites—could be covered. This means workers injured at places like docks, yards, warehouses, or ship repair facilities on land related to maritime operations can still receive benefits. That’s why the statement is true: landward sites were added to widen the scope of coverage. Offshore platforms are not the focus here (they’re seaward), and the amendments did not exclude harbor workers or make coverage irrelevant to maritime claims; they actually broaden who and where benefits apply to.